Questions & Answers

Why do you sell an expensive Faderport for DAW control, but for rack mixers we have to mix on a touchscreen??

+22 votes
406 views
asked May 10, 2021 in StudioLive Series Feature Requests by ard-janbarnas1 (480 points)
The Faderport line is marketed as having physical controls for your DAW, but for the StudioLive rack mixers there is no such control surface and it is marketed how great it is to use a touchscreen surface to control the mixer??

I would buy the 32R in a heartbeat if there was a physical control surface ala Faderport. (or something like the PreSonus CS18 that was discontinued).

I don't want to play live and have to mess with a touchscreen, or if I do want to use Faderport, I'd have to load my instruments first in Studio One (or other DAW). That defeats the purpose of the rack mixer in my opinion, especially when used as a standalone mixer.

1 Answer

+1 vote
answered Jun 18, 2021 by jonnydoyle (403,520 points)
 
Best answer

Thank you for the feature request. 

If anyone else agrees or disagrees, please VOTE!

The developers pay close attention to those that are voted on the most. 

You are allowed one vote. You can change your vote later if you choose.

(Here's some helpful info on how to use the voting system)

Please vote the original question / feature request. 

Please DO NOT Vote on THIS response!

...