Question

We do not need 16x 31band EQ's on all Aux outputs, but would like to have more Reverbs and may be some other FX like chorus. Thus, give the user a choice how he will use the DSP power:
- full graphic EQ's and 4 FX (like it is at the moment)
- reduced graphic EQ's and 6 FX (I like the way some Yamaha units save DSP power on the graphics: all are 31 bands, but you can only use 15 at the time. I think this is more than enough on the aux, especially if you use the aux for inear monitoring)

Answer 1

Thank you for the feature request. 

If anyone else agrees or disagrees, then please vote it up, or down. 

 

To vote:

In agreement click on the little blue triangle pointing up.

In disagreement click on the little blue triangle pointing down.

The developers pay close attention to those that are voted on the most. 

You are allowed one vote. 

Just viewing and agreeing but not clicking on the vote does not help the issue. 

Please click on one or the other. 

Answer 2

Yes, yes, YES!!!!!

I mentioned this request a while ago, long before the new feature request mechanism. But great to read about it again! And to hear that I was not the only one to mention this.

DSP power is maxed out and I susspect the many 31 band EQ's have to do with this.

To be honest, I have NEVER (!!!!!!) used ANY of the graphic EQ's on the RM as long as I owned and used it, and I use the RM as a pro engineer on all kind of gigs, small and huge.

When you use goof quality microphones and speakers using the parametric EQ's are just way enough to do all EQ things, at least with me. Perhaps having 6 bands on the Main outputs would be nice to have, so an additional 2, but on the monitors 4 is always way enough.

I would rather have better FX!! 4 is plenty, but just better quality and 3 verbs and 1 delay would be great.

Answer 3

In contrast I think it sucks that you only have GEQ on AUX1-12 and only have output delay on AUX13-16